Thus, if you want to highlight a specific spot in the script or make a comprehensive edit, – you would have to describe it all in writing in the comment. Visual comments can only be left on images or videos.
#Frameio competitors pdf#
For example, you can add a PDF file with the brief or a script, but you cannot leave a visual comment on it. Online Proofing FeaturesĪlthough Frame.io is designed merely for video review, it actually lacks some of the most useful features in the commenting section. Let’s have a look at some of the benefits you gain from switching to Krock.io. However, Krock.io offers way more functionalities, making a case for a great Frame.io alternative! Krock.io and Frame.io share some great features for video review. Especially when it comes to video review – one of the most time-consuming types of content production.
Not to mention, that creative teams usually need to use a project management platform together with Frame.io, doubling the costs and hampering the efficiency of the workflow.Ĭontent creators are in a constant search for tools that would make their work processes more efficient. If we look at the pool of apps for managing video feedback – Frame.io is one of the most widely used tools.īut, given its recent acquisition by Adobe, which left current users uncertain whether the service would endure the same level of user-friendliness, many video production teams are looking for better alternatives to Frame.io.
#Frameio competitors software#
It’s impossible to view a ProRes file or a DNxHR file right in the browser (you’re viewing an H.264 version in the browser), so if you want to examine them in their native format, you can download the original files untouched from the Frame.io project.In the age of remote work, collaboration software has become an indispensable part of a creative workflow. We used Adobe Media Encoder to produce the rendered files (we used a plugin in order to add VP8 and VP9 exporting capabilities), and we used After Effects to produce the Difference clips, with the Curves effect to increase brightness/contrast. We uploaded the original RED R3D files as well.
We’ve uploaded all of the media so that you can download them and replicate our tests, or do your own. With the clips in a version stack, you can use the side-by-side comparison view to look at two different codecs side by side, including their Difference videos. We uploaded all 552 resulting video clips to the Codec Comparison Project, and we used Frame.io’s Version Stack feature to combine all of the different codecs for each clip into a single asset. In order to make the differences easier to see, we increased the brightness slightly. In areas where the image is light, the codec has lost information.
In areas where the image is black, the codec has done a great job. The resulting images highlight any areas where the codec is losing information. Then, one by one, we overlaid the compressed files on top of the original uncompressed DPX files and used the Difference blend mode. Then, we transcoded each of those clips to 46 different codec variations and uploaded them to the project. First, we filmed several different shots with extremely high-resolution RED cameras (at 8K or 6K), and then we downsampled those to 4K uncompressed DPX files, to ensure that we were starting with perfect pixel quality.
0 kommentar(er)
